via NFL.com
You don't always have to play your best to beat another team. Sometimes you have to be just a touch better than your opponent. That's what the Chiefs were on Sunday- a touch better than the Raiders. No blowout. No gaping holes in the stat sheet. Just a couple of breaks went our way and the defense finally held an opponent back in the 4th quarter.
It was fun to watch the Raiders bungle their way out of a win. You kind of knew it was going to happen which makes it all the more funny when it did.
The fake field goal was classic Raiders chicanery gone wrong. I bet they practiced that fake field goal flip like three times and thought it would work.
Greatest tight end of all time...yadda yadda yadda
One of the biggest difference makers in the game was Tony Gonzalez. Gonzalez led all receivers in catches and yards yesterday, catching 8 passes for 110 yards. On the Chiefs only offensive drive for a touchdown, Gonzalez caught two 3rd and long passes for first downs, using his big body as a shield against the very capable but inferior Raiders' secondary.
Tony was feeling good enough yesterday that he was giving advice to Raiders' RE Zach Miller.
Still can't impose our will
When I say "impose our will", I'm talking specifically about being able to play the game we want to regardless what the opponent's defense is playing. The biggest test of imposing our will came, of course, in the 4th quarter.
The Chiefs were up by 10 points with 7:50 left in the game. As soon as the Chiefs got the ball on this drive, I really wanted to see them mount a 4-5 minute drive and just take the game completely out of the Raiders hands. Larry Johnson had been successful running the ball pretty much all day so I figured the Chiefs had a decent shot to convert some first downs rushing the ball and take away a big chunk of the clock.
It didn't happen that way. Two negative plays and one LJ 9-yard run forced a Chiefs punt.
Now to be fair, the Chiefs were able to convert first downs on their last possession of the game, effectively ending it when Larry Johnson ran for 15 yards with two and a half minutes left. That was impressive. Regardless, when the Chiefs' offense has left the door open before, it usually hasn't been good. The defense making that critical stop is the exception to the rule.
One key stat IMO in this imposing of the will is rushing first downs, which the Chiefs had seven of. Couple that with 10 passing first downs and you have one of the most balanced first down conversion rates the Chiefs have had all season long.
No more half time naps
| 3rd Qtr | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 |
The evidence that the Chiefs are getting out coached after halftime grows from week to week.
I think we have an acceptable offensive line now
Funny thing is, even though the Chiefs offensive line is playing as well as they need to play, a few of these starters aren't going to be on the team next year. Thigpen's mobility and Mike Cox's blocking are welcome additions to the offensive attack this year and probably the two main reasons we're not screaming at the o-line every week. To think that the Chiefs would go from having one of the worst offensive lines in franchise history to one that doesn't make the weekly headlines, you have to be satisfied.
Maurice Leggett
One of our, ahem, two rookie D-II starting corner backs, Maurice Leggett has been playing well above his expectations. Sort of a Tyron Brackenridge of 2008, Leggett has been picked on the last month or so by opposing teams who would rather pass away from Brandon Flowers and others.
On Sunday, he returned the Raiders laughable attempt at a fake field goal for a touchdown and added five tackles. Like Brackenridge, Leggett may be around next year to continue his play as the nickel cornerback but keep in mind that his name is getting called a lot because teams are picking on him. As excited as fans may be about him, history says it's likely he won't be here for long.
Running game
Larry Johnson ran the ball pretty well and it was Johnson's 15 yard run late in the 4th quarter that effectively won the game for the Chiefs.
The offensive line is doing an improved job of getting moderate running lanes open and our running backs are taking advantage of them.
Tyler Thigpen has essentially been the Chiefs' number 2 running back the last few weeks. He ran the ball 11 times on Sunday. Jamaal Charles only rushed the ball twice.
Our running game is performing at about the appropriate level of production relative to our offensive scheme.
via NFL.com
Derrick Johnson's potential shows up again
One of the things that annoys me most about Derrick Johnson is that he'll only have three, maybe four really good games a year. Yesterday was one of those games.
Johnson amassed seven tackles and a number of big time hits against the Raiders. He was pumped up and briefly appeared to be a defensive leader, something the Chiefs desperately need.
Well, Jamarcus Russell did makes things easier
Yes, a win is a win. But in the grand scheme of "progress", it would be tough to take a lot away from the Chiefs' defensive performance. Raiders QB Jamarcus Russell 10/28 for 132 yards. Seven of those completions and 103 of those yards came in the first half.
Russell, not unlike the whole Raider team, was not aggressive in the least and looked to me to be overwhelmed at times during the game. His ability to process real time football information seems to be lacking.
Thigpen's mistakes
Tyler Thigpen's tendency to throw the high ball showed back up again yesterday. On multiple occasions, Thigpen's passes soared way above their intended targets. A more capable defense has at least one more interception of Tyler Thigpen.
Even with those mistakes, it's pretty much impossible to root against this guy. He's established a fantastic rapport with his receivers, especially Tony Gonzalez and Dwayne Bowe. For the most part, Thigpen's timing was great against the Raiders and that has been one of his big improvements on the year.
***
It's tough to celebrate this win because it's only our second win of the season and it wasn't especially pretty. The Raiders made mistakes and the Chiefs capitalized. A rather boring contest that probably won't be repeated next week in Denver against the Broncos. The Broncos are ranked 27th against the pass which has to make Tyler Thigpen smile.
0 recs | 48 comments
It is a win
I am not overly excited, it was Oakland, we have beat them six times there. Everytime I think this team has turned the corner they fail with a long losing streak again. The clock management was bad again yesterday, three timeouts in a little over five minutes. If Oakland had not handed us this game with the fake field goal attempt, do we still win? I know a little critical, but hey thats me. Hmm, Plaxico Burress in police custody.
Eric Allen - December 1, 2008
3rd Q
…Miller said. “I got involved early, and then we didn’t have the ball as much in the third quarter.”
http://www.sacbee.com/raiders/story/1438456.html
So it ain’t all bad. Does need to get better, though – Herm need a long sit-down with Tony Dungy, I think – a crash course in motiation & second-half adjusstments.
Bleedingredandgold - December 1, 2008
Why did the Raiders get
away from the run? Here I thought we had a not so smart HC!
Eric Allen - December 1, 2008
Regarding Tony's Advice To Miller
He’s right…Miller’s a talented TE, but he’s going to have a short career if Russell doesn’t dramatically improve his accuracy. One of these days he’s going to reach for one of Russell’s overthrows and BAM!!! he’ll get seriously messed up. Which would be a shame because he looks like he could have a very promising career.
UCrawford - December 1, 2008
And Regarding The Broncos' Pass D Ranking
Keep in mind that a significant portion of that was because they lost Champ Bailey for an extended period of time. I believe he’ll be back and healthy against us next week.
UCrawford - December 1, 2008
They'll put him on Gonzalez
just like the Raiders did with Asomugha – it is always a good battle. Let’s hope that opens things up for Bradley, who should be facing the nickel-back much of the day, with Bly on Bowe.
PVChiefsfan - December 1, 2008
One thing from week 4
was that we picked on Bly with Bowe the entire game. If Huard had kept a couple more fade routes in bounds then Bowe would have had another 70+ yards that game.
JayrodT - December 1, 2008
Leggett's TD
History may indicate that he is not going to be around. However, I like the idea that he is getting picked on. The less we hear about Flowers the better because that means he isn’t getting thrown too.
I went on NFL.com and watched replays of the Leggett’s return and he should get credit for being in the right position. He saw the whole thing and had Oakland’s kicker in his cross hairs well before the ball ever hit the ground. So if the Chief’s defense and special teams is about reacting and being in position, then he should be credited with a great play and not merely one of those “lucky” plays.
That said, the whole play reminded me of the Nebraska-Colorado fake field goal was so well read by the Colorado special teams it looked like Nebraska drew it up that way.
schraggyj - December 1, 2008
it's official...
Tyler T. has a “W” in his short career…congratulation!!!!! I think now he’s ahead of brodie croyle in that department
ali_djoo - December 1, 2008
Thigpen's Mistakes
One thing I noticed and it needs to be coached out of him is with his cannon of an arm he will throw off his back foot a lot or just not step into his throws. That will cause the ball to sail and is bad news if he does it too much.
tevans96 - December 1, 2008
Jamarcus Russell = David Carr
I haven’t seen that bad of an opposing QB since the Chiefs faced the Texan’s a few years ago. It can’t be overstated how bad Russell was. He was missing receivers by a good 5 yards when they were wide open. A better QB and the Raiders would have won this game.
The only positive to take away was the better tackling.
rdub - December 1, 2008
Raiders suffer from the same problem the Chiefs do
They’re incapable of developing talent. Review all the 1st round picks they’ve had through the years. The draft isn’t THAT big of a gamble and with their track record it ain’t all coincidence. Russell obviously has a great skillset some would kill for but he’ll never reach his full potentail in a Raiders uniform. I am one of the few that still believed Carr had potentail it was just squandered on an expansion team. He blew chunks in Carolina too but they brought him to New York and started actually teaching him fundamentals and took him back to square 1. This was never done in Houston or Carolina and the result was he showed great improvement and in the preseason played so well the Giants decided to only take 2 QB’s into the season. One thing for sure, if I was a Raiders fan I’d be DEEPLY concerned over Russell’s development and makes me thanful I’m a Chiefs fan
KansasCityShuffle - December 1, 2008
Agreed On Russell
It’s not reasonable to expect him to be a Pro Bowler in his first season as a full-time starter but he should be much farther along than he is right now. The level of inaccuracy with him should be extremely troubling. And the Raiders QB situation has been an absolute disaster zone since Gannon retired…even vets who go in there play like crap. A rookie probably hasn’t got a chance.
UCrawford - December 1, 2008
I forgot to mention Walter too
I thought Andrew Walter was a promising QB from his class and the Raiders have done nothing with him. If you’re a QB and your name is called on draft day by Oakland, you better manage your money wisely….
KansasCityShuffle - December 1, 2008
Re: History & Leggett
I for one hope he proves us all wrong. He’s really learning out there and improving by the week. I’ll take any signs of development we can get…
KansasCityShuffle - December 1, 2008
true dat
Lanier63 - December 1, 2008
I'm trying to get with the times and be hip
you feel me?
Lanier63 - December 1, 2008
I do
Bridging the generation gap as we speak.
Joel Thorman - December 1, 2008
We feel ya, dawg
KansasCityShuffle - December 1, 2008
"Get With" And "Hip" Are Already Out Of Date Terms
Sorry Lanier, once you fall behind the current terminology it’s usually a permanent condition. Happens to us all eventually. :)
UCrawford - December 1, 2008
Fo-shizzle to the manizzle
THE_TRUTH - December 1, 2008
What tha...??:)
Eric Allen - December 1, 2008
Don't listen to him Lanier
We roll with you, Pops ; ^ )
KansasCityShuffle - December 1, 2008
I seem to have too many permanent conditions at this stage
Lanier63 - December 1, 2008
Denver's also 28th against the run
The scary question is what if the Chiefs go 6-10? Unlikely, but it’s @Den (who we somehow beat and is a complete mess), SD (who could only edge us out by a point at home), Mia (2 weeks is a lot of time for Joey Porter to say something stupid), and @Cin (worse than the Chiefs and in no way in a youth movement).
The worst part about a 6-10 is that it would hurt our draft position significantly and it takes Herm further off the hot seat while further validating a much more legitimate concern than the “fire harm cause he’s a doofus” is worried about. Namely, all his teams have been slow starters and strong finishers. Since we believe Denver effectively eliminated us from the playoffs yesterday there’s no danger of a 2006 crabwalk miracle to 1st round elimination, but with this consistent slow start track record what happens if the Chiefs’ development pays off but we’re never able to get off to better than a 4-4 start?
Dangerous. We’d like a nice 4-12 thank you, keep the picks high, keep the pressure on, but 4 wins is enough that the journalists can say “see I told you so” and probably keep things objective in evaluating the coaching rather than straight torches and pitchforks.
Official Arrowhead Pride Parade - December 1, 2008
6-10....and monkey's might fly out of my butt
and next year will be a whooooole lot better. I looked at our home schedule which is obviously stacked for failure considering our history. And history and stats is what I go by.
No one is pulling the pitchforks out for “harm” …we do however pull the stats out. I say keep him for another year…to prove what most of us have been saying. That way there will be no excuse.
The improvement (or lack thereof) will be visible during the Toilet Bowl against Cinci. That will be the answer to everyone’s question whether we’ve improved this year. I just wish we could play Detroit as well.
THE_TRUTH - December 1, 2008
Detroit will beat Minnesota this weekend
my pick for upset of the week…
PVChiefsfan - December 1, 2008
You might be right there
THE_TRUTH - December 1, 2008
No way
Minnesota will run AP all day..
Joel Thorman - December 1, 2008
False statement.
That statement can only be true if you replace “Minnesota” with “a local junior high team” and “this weekend” with “barely”.
Mully - December 1, 2008
=)
HA!
PVChiefsfan - December 2, 2008
Now if they have banana's in their hands when that happens
I’ll be impressed. lol
Lanier63 - December 1, 2008
I'll make a fruit salad then and invite everyone from the board that keeps praising the Harminator ;)
THE_TRUTH - December 1, 2008
Who cares about the draft?
I think high draft picks are way overrated. They hold out for expensive contracts, they get all up in their own hype, their egos grow and get all pissy. It isn’t worth it.
I would be over the moon if we ended up 6-10, it shows great progress and would do our confidence a world of good.
sir eccles - December 1, 2008
Agreed
I’d be happy to be in the 4-6 win range. To me, that’s where you get the most value.
Joel Thorman - December 1, 2008
In that 4-6 win range...
would it be wrong to go RT if he is the best player available? Will anyone be disappointed if we spend all first day draft picks on defense?
Eric Allen - December 1, 2008
DE
The top RT will likely be taken in the bottom half of the 1st round, at best. I’d prefer to address DE in the first round then QB/RT/MLB from then on (not necessarily in that order).
Joel Thorman - December 1, 2008
I just hope o-line
Is not put on the backburner as in years past, we need to get the o-line of the next ten years together, then it is time to dominate!
Eric Allen - December 1, 2008
I don't think it will be
We need a RT (good ones in round 2) and a G (good ones in 3-6). And a center, which if memory serves me correctly is usually in the later rounds (5-7).
Joel Thorman - December 1, 2008
I really like I think it is Carter
From Tech 6’7" 3354 pounds he is a guard that moves well, wonder if he could play rt?
Eric Allen - December 1, 2008
Thats a big boy
KansasCityShuffle - December 1, 2008
We're all about converting guards to tackles
right? =)
PVChiefsfan - December 2, 2008
Woked once!:)
Eric Allen - December 2, 2008
What size waist would a 3354 pound man have?
Lanier63 - December 2, 2008
3000 yards!
Eric Allen - December 2, 2008
354, sorry.
Eric Allen - December 1, 2008
Yep 3354 pounds would be our whole o-line!
Eric Allen - December 1, 2008
Uh
That would be both teams’ whole o-lines…
PVChiefsfan - December 2, 2008
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Arrowhead Pride to post a comment.