SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Arrowhead Pride

Arrowheadlines: Chiefs News 1/10

Good morning and congratulations to Romeo Crennel! As you can imagine, today's Kansas City Chiefs news looks at the head coaching hire. Enjoy.

The lasting image that Chiefs general manager Scott Pioli has of Romeo Crennel is from a photograph taken in the mid-1970s. Crennel, then an assistant coach at Texas Tech, wore a bushy mustache and a big smile while he posed with the young daughter of colleague Bill Parcells.

"It's quite the image," Pioli said.

Decades later, Pioli is married to Parcells' daughter, Dallas, and is staking his reputation on the man with the mustache. The times have changed, and Crennel isn't the young and inexperienced coach he was in the photograph. He has learned from good times and bad, and Pioli announced Monday that he trusts that Crennel has learned enough to be the face - now with only a cropped salt-and-pepper mustache - of the Chiefs' future.

Chiefs Turn To Romeo Crennel's Experience from KC Star

Now that Crennel has been chosen as head coach, the wheels of the 2012 offseason have officially been set into motion.

First up is finalizing a staff.

Since he took over as Kansas City's interim head coach, Crennel was clear in his opinion that a head coach must be permitted to construct his own staff in order to be successful. Crennel will have full authority to make those decisions, beginning with choosing an offensive coordinator and defensive coordinator.

Crennel's Hiring Puts The Offseason In Motion from The Mothership

Star-divide

KC Star Photo Gallery: Romeo Crennel Through The Years

NFL.com Video: Crennel Named Chiefs Head Coach

NFL.com Video: Coaches Show: Crennel Named Chiefs' Coach

Crennel has 30 years of NFL coaching experience. He was a defensive coach on the staff of five Super Bowl champion teams and was the head coach for Cleveland from 2005 through 2008, compiling a 24-40 record.

"This job is not always the easiest job to have," Crennel said. "I had one once before and it didn't turn out like I wanted it to. I'm going to work very hard to try to make this one turn out the way I want it to."

It's Official: Crennel Is Chiefs' New Coach from KC Star

Q: Romeo, you are immensely popular in the locker room. The players really were pulling for you. Are you a "players' coach?"

CRENNEL: "I'm not exactly sure what a players' coach is. Sometimes, I think players think that a coach who is on their side is a players' coach or who always rules in favor of them may be a players' coach. Now, I know that that's not always the case with me. I think that basically I'm a good guy. I think this is what players appreciate: players appreciate honesty; players appreciate you telling them like it is. They don't always want to hear it, but that's what they appreciate and that's what I try to do to the players. I try to tell them what I believe, what I feel and how I think it should be done. So, I think that that's what they appreciate, that I will be fair with them. They don't always like it, they're not crazy about it, but they appreciate it.

Chairman & CEO Clark Hunt, GM Scott Pioli & Head Coach Romeo Crennel from The Mothership

This is the right man at the right time, as much as that can be said at the moment, but the more important reaction to his being announced as the Chiefs' permanent head coach can be summarized in one word:

Enough.

As in, enough with the former Patriots. Enough getting the band back together. Three years after taking over, general manager Scott Pioli has made this organization a fuzzy copy of what he saw in New England, and the only reason it's still floating along with potential is that he's signed the most talented players he inherited.

Romeo Crennel Is Good For The Chiefs - If Scott Pioli Changes His Ways from KC Star

I wouldn't go as far as to say there would have been a mutiny in the Kansas City locker room had Crennel been bypassed for this job. However, he has universal support from the players, and they already showed they'll play hard for him. The Chiefs have a good, young roster, and they should be a lot healthier in 2012. The future is bright.

Pioli Makes Right Call In Crennel from ESPN

"One thing RAC said at the time was, 'I want you to go out and talk to other people because if you make this decision, I want you to know that you're making the right decision,'" Pioli said.

Many players had said they wanted to win the last three games to help Crennel get the job.

"Throughout the year, we were all over a little bit. We came to a common ground over the last three weeks," said fullback Le'Ron McClain. "We started doing good when Romeo stepped in."

Chiefs Pick Romeo Crennel As Head Coach from The Associated Press via USA Today

"In the old days, a players' coach was a guy who didn't work 'em very hard," Vermeil said. "I think that's changed over the years to somebody who respected the players and gave them the same respect he expects from them.

"But that doesn't mean he isn't going to work them hard. That doesn't mean he isn't going to challenge them, that doesn't mean he's not going to chew them out, or cut them or waive them or fire them. But when they're at work, he's going to treat them with respect."

Crennel Seemed To Be Players' Choice from KC Star

0 recs  |  147 comments

Comments

I like this, Pioli picks the pieces, but it needs to be left up to Crennel to form Voltron.
He calls his boss Scott, and the first thing he did upon taking over was switch quarterbacks. The second thing was to tell Scott that he switched quarterbacks.
Now if he could just switch from

Cassel to a “new, improved” quarterback, that would be good.

are batteries included?

Warning: completely obligatory but totally irrelevant Red vs. Blue quote follows.
Tucker: You know what? Forget what I said before. We can definitely pick up chicks in this thing – probably two or three chicks apiece.

Church: Oh, man… listen to you! What are you gonna do with two chicks?

Tucker: Church, Women are like Voltron. The more you can hook up, the better it gets.


Source.

What would it take to get the number two pick from the Rams?

At least this years number one, plus next years, a number two pick, maybe this or next years, and what else?

I doubt Pioli would do it as it has never been his style, but I’ve never seen a kid throw a ball like Griffin does.

People talk about him being the prototype “running QB”, but that is not true. Completion rate of over 70% with over HALF his passes at least 35 yards or more.

I may defend Cassel, but watch me dump him for Griffin in two seconds.

It’s a pipe dream, but a nice one.

I've heard people say that since the money required to pay a top-10 pick is less, teams will be more apt to trade up..

But I think the opposite can be said as well. The Chiefs may look at jumping up into the top-5 more now then they would have a few years ago, but those top-5 teams will also value their picks more since you don’t have to give a kid $50 million guaranteed.

I don't think it's the money

I think it’s what you have to give up in picks. Look at what the dumb ass Raiders gave up for Palmer.

With the new system, teams in the top-5 are finally at an advantage, like it should have been the whole time..

In years past, everyone picking there wanted to trade down because they didn’t want to have to eat the huge contracts associated with them.

With the absurd guaranteed contracts being a thing of the past, it’ll take a kings ransom to jump into the top-5.

Prime example being the Falcons trade for Julio Jones, swapping 1st’s, and giving up a 2nd, 4th, and this years 1st and 4th. To go from our 11th-ish to 2-3 this year would probably be along the same lines, and I think Pioli’s a little too conservative to it.

I agree
I also look at the timeline issue..

I’m not sure if (just going off of our past here) we’re a team that would start a rookie QB. That being the case, and assuming that Pioli’s closer to getting fired than he is an extension, I don’t see him having the patience to draft a rookie QB in the top-5 just to have him sit a year or two.

I don't think Griffin would sit, he'd start
If we make the drastic move of going up and getting him, I'd hope so too..

I’m just saying it’s not as obvious with us as it might be with other teams.

If they made that drastic of a move

It would be for one reason only…….. to start him.

by severn58: Man, that's gonna sting, sittin' thru the 1st without a pick and without a playoff win to show for Julio.

Must’ve been tough for Atlanta, throwing those passes down the middle to Tony G, when they needed to march down the sidelines, but couldn’t. Reminds me of Tony G’s time in KC. It was sad that they went for Julio, but still couldn’t strike downfield when they needed to.

Atlanta has no pass rush

Eli just picked that secondary apart

Also, their starting LT was Svitek.
That's also a good point, but

The Rams don’t really need that pick. They have their QB. More picks will be of more value to them, especially picks that are not in late rounds. They can pretty much have their call in this. They’re in good shape. They need to surround Bradfor with some talent and they in a perfect spot, the drivers seat if you will.

Very true, but it's not Pioli's MO to give up draft picks, either.

We have too many holes for this team to go giving the farm up….If he did it, and snagged RG3, would I be pissed? Absolutely not, lol…but I’d be stunned because it’s so outside of his “zone.”

I know

I did mention that is not his style. I am always nervous when a team does that because it usually has too many consequences. I guess it always depends on what they ask for and in this case…….. A LOT

I think a better trade partner would be the Vikings

The Rams need a LT bad or Bradford will continue to get killed. The Vikings need WR and CB help and you can get them all through the 1st and 2nd rounds.

Rams had two young tackles on IR this year. They might still believe in one or both of them coming back.
We hashed this over heaviliy some time ago - and it can be looked at either way

Yes the $$ is less for the top picks, but the value and the ROI is still there. If the perception is that you’re stepping up to get a top notch quality guy, you’re still likely to have to dish out a bit to make that move. The nice part however is that if you do have to give up considerable concessions to make that move – you are no longer going to pay through the nose in a rookie contract for a top 5 guy.

So in the past it was: Make large concession to move up and get a high pick + pay out the ass for the skyrocketing top pick salary.

Now it will be: Make large concession to move up and get a high pick, but slotting of the rookie wage scale keeps the contract to a reasonable level.

The risk is still there in terms of what you sacrifice to move up – but the financial risk and potential for long term damage should the pick not work out has been mitigated substantially.

I think it would take...

At least:
2012 & 2013 1st Rounder
2012 2nd Rounder
2012 3rd Rounder or 2013 2nd Rounder

The Rams are in total control over the situation and could just as easily take Blackmon from Ok. St. and do nothing. However, with a new coach coming in they may want to stockpile picks and build. I’m not necessarily against this move but at the same time I don’t know how I feel about putting all our eggs into the RGIII basket. I think it would definitely provide a whole lot of excitement going into next season though.

Wow thats expensive

I cant say I would be happy with that even for RGIII. The Rams NEED WRs too, and badly.
I figured a good trade with them would be a sign and trade with Bowe, 2012 1st and 2013 2nd or 3rd. Still expensive but I would not be upset with this because we would be trading a top notch WR for a francise QB while we still had Breaston and Baldwin and enough picks to still shore up out Oline. Make it even sweate3r by replace Bowe in that scenario with Breaston and upiing to 2012 1st and 3rd and 2013 2nd

Bowe is the one variable.

If we gave him up it would definitely cost us less in terms of picks but I think we would still have to part with our first and second this year and maybe even a pick next year.

Well we would swap firsts this year, trade Bowe, possibly 2 or 3rd next year IMO

They would get a top WR, get chance at an OT at 11/12, get an extra high pick next year

I'm not sold on Balwin yet

I saw little or no separation from the defenders with Baldwin. Bowe seems to get open much more often and I’d hate to trade that skill away.

Baldwin was also used crappidly with Haley and Muir

As a TE/Blocker quite often

A QB who's in tune will have areas to throw to.

He’s a big, long-striding WR, who’s already shown he’ll catch the quick slants and crossers, as well as the long ball. I just hope the new/old OC is more adaptable than Haley was.

Agreed

Can’t say Baldwin is a bust yet after the crappy year due to playcalling and Qb play

Right Mellinger.

Pioli hasn’t brought any new talent into kc. Not that guy who scored the only td in our last game. Not the young offensive lineman who has done so well. Not that young safety who we missed so much.

Rac was the right guy for the job at this time.

Yeah,

but name the 5 best players on the team…

Charles, Hali, Johnson, Flowers, Bowe

Sure, throw Berry in there...

still mostly inherited.

You can't BLAME that on Pioli

Plus, it took a long time for all of them to develop.

No blame at all.

I think it’s great they were extended. Just pointing out that Mellinger’s statement was correct about inheriting the best players.

agreed

Mellinger doesn’t lie … people may dislike his opinions, but I’ve always found the guy to be spot on correct about things, and drop dead honest and truthful

of course, a lot of people dislike the truth … when it isn’t a self-flattering picture that’s being painted, we generally don’t want to see it

I'm not accusing him of lying.

I’m accusing him of ignoring the talent Pioli has brought in. Further, why do people act like it’s a knock on him for re-signing the good players he inherited? He’s brought in and filled real problem spots. There have been posts on it!

Implying that which you know not to be true is a form of lying.

It’s disingenuous. That can be cute sometimes, like when your buddy farts and blames it on the dog. But it’s not cute when a “journalist” does it solely to generate hits.

Lying usually is done purposely.

I don’t know that he’s ignoring the talent on purpose. But if he is, then he’s lying just to get people to read a paper that hardly anyone reads anymore.

He is doing it on purpose. He's too smart to just not recognize it's there.
Fair enough

But Pioli’s first class turned 3 this year – and the old adage is you can’t judge a draft class before 3 years should be considered.

In 2-3 years – a majority of the “good” players may be players that came through these drafts.

I think it’s as much a function of time as it is the quality of the guys.

oh, I think we have a handle on Pioli's first draft from 2009 ...

TJax has been better than average, not a “superstar stud” for a #3 overall, but he’s developing alright for us

Cassel and Vrabel … Vrabel was ok for a year, declined quite a bit in 2010, then retired, and Cassel … well, we know about that

Alex Magee (third round I believe) didn’t exactly work out, did he?

And you think that the 2010 and 2011 drafts will turn out the same as 2009.
Or the tight end we miss so much

Or the linebacker that never got a chance to play, or, the QB you all hate, or Arenas, Lewis, and others.

Lets see how smart he is?

Hopefully Romeo will bring orton back or another veteran to give cassel a run for his money,and somebody looking over his shoulder.if this does not happen then we all know that pioli wont allow this to happen.then we will be in the same shoes as always,a half ass offense with a half ass Quarterback.this will let us all know what direction were heading to.orton looked better in three games than cassel did all year.like romeo said if not for orton,he wouldnt of got this job.

See my post above
If Cassel is the starter this year

I think he is on a very short leash.

And what if PIOLI does not bring back Orton, then what?

It’s not up to RAC but it is up to Pioli to bring back Orton or any other player. RAC can only coach the players he is given.

It's also up to Orton.
The huge endorsement RAC gave Orton

I think Pioli will try to bring him back

If Orton signs with another team, you can't just assume it's because Pioli didn't try to sign him.

On the other hand, there should be NO excuse for not having some veteran QB presence behind/competing with Cassel. I’m still pissed we didn’t sign Kerry Collins last year.

Kerry Collins got benched in favor of Curtis Painter
No, he got injured.

Painter actually got benched in favor of Collins…before the season even began, Colts signed Collins to start. I actually felt sorry for Painter. That might be a big part of what got the GM fired – why are we paying a backup QB if we have to go sign a starting QB off the street at the last minute?

Especially when the backup QB is a recent draft pick who you grabbed to be Manning's replacement

then Manning goes down and his replacement is in no position to replace him?

Oops…

pioli gave

This team a chance he has alot of pieces in place but this offseason he needs to nail it and I think he knows that.

A few more adjustments on offense and defense like liabilities like replacing Cassel, belcher richardson and upgrade there get a new dt and resign important free agents like Orton mcclain bowe and carr and draft well pioli could nail a serious threat for super bowls starting next year

You're right

Cassel will not be so easy replace. Just reality. See my post above about trying to get the number two pick from the Rams.

It's obvious from Kyle Orton's play that a mediocre

quarterback such as he (I think everyone would agree he is not an elite qb), is still an upgrade over Cassel. Cassel is not the worst quarterback who ever came down the pike (see Tyler Palko) but neither is he an elite or perhaps even a solid middle of the road quarterback. Kyle Orton>Matt Cassel. However Orton is a free agent so unless some manuevering is done, we are going to be stuck with Cassel.

True

The fact that most of us were excited to see Orton…just goes to show how painfully average Cassel is.

I’d take Orton over Cassel. But, I really don’t want either one of them leading this team.

Exactly.
I think the reason people were so excited to see Orton...

had more to do with Palko than Cassel. It was anyone but Palko at that point.

Crennel on Cassel on Monday.
“Matt Cassel has won here. We’ve been to a playoff with Matt Cassel. I don’t think that Matt Cassel has fallen off the wagon overnight. I think he’s a good talent. He’s a good quarterback and he’s taken us to a playoff. So I anticipate that he can do it again.”
Right. What's he supposed to say?

“Matt Cassel has won here, but I’m gonna move on. I encourage Scott to do whatever it takes to bring in a new QB here in KC. I’m not sure what the trade value is on Matt, but we gotta deal this guy and get a new QB under center. "

???

Coachspeak is still coachspeak. Orton, who he also praised, is a free agent. That leaves Cassel, Stanzi, and heaven forbid, Tyler Palko.

It sounded more like he was beginning the apologies to Orton.

Reading between the lines it sounded more like “I like you, Kyle, but ya see, we have this guy already under contract, who’s gonna be healthy come training camp.”

not so hard

Resign Orton or flynn or draft keenum wheedon or give stanzi a shot everyone one of those qbs have shown more than Cassel has in fundamentals arm strength accuracy and ability to read the field

Keenum, Wheedon and Stanzi

Have never played in the NFL, so you have no idea if they will be any good.

Flynn is going to cost a fortune. I think he is an excellant QB, having nothing to do with his incredible game against the Lions.

I won’t get into the Orton thing again today.

Keenum, Wheedon and Stanzi...
Have never played in the NFL, so you have no idea if they will be any good.

That’s true, but Cassel never played a game in USC as the starter and lost out to Matt Leinart. At least with these guys we can see how they played in college as starters for their respective teams. If they can take a chance on a guy like Cassel then I think they can take a chance on someone like Wheedon.

Lost out to a Heisman winner.. yeah that's terrible
yeah

They haven’t but there loads more improved in there basics than Cassel and have room to grow Cassel hit his ceiling like everyone was saying even Orton looked way better than Cassel atleast in making the oline look better and finding the open guy by getting the ball out

If Stanzi were better than Cassel or Orton ...

… Stanzi would’ve been playing.

He wasn’t.

That tells you all you need to know.

He was a rookie man.

Playing under a head coach who seemed to hate rookies and inexplicably love Tyler Palko. By the time Crennel took over, we had Orton.

Not really fair to judge Stanzi in any way at this point.

Well, you can say that he's not as good as Orton.

:)

Or at least he wasn't deemed ready.

Other QBs, some of them very, very good, were deemed unready-for-primetime, as rookies.

If he's not ready, then he's not good right now.

Kinda the definition of ready. I hope he becomes good, of course.

That’s true, but Cassel never played a game in USC as the starter and lost out to Matt Leinart. At least with these guys we can see how they played in college as starters for their respective teams. If they can take a chance on a guy like Cassel then I think they can take a chance on someone like Wheedon.

Except they didn’t have to “take a chance on a guy like Cassel”…because they had 15.5 NFL games worth of film on Cassel to review before deciding whether to acquire him.

heh

And how well did it work out for us last time we threw the farm at a SB contenders back up QB

No Stanzi

He was average at Iowa; nothing spectacular. Too many midwesterners think he was a great QB in college. Sorry he wasn’t.

He actually was pretty good in college.
He didn't have the numbers of say a Chase Daniels, thus he sucks
Chase has a SB ring too
Matt Cassel held a clipboard

at the Super Bowl when the Patsies lost to the NYG.

Not saying Stanzi will turn into Brady

but Brady was average at Michigan and look how he turned out.

He was a very good QB in college, and he has all the tools to be a successful NFL QB.

He’s also an unknown commodity, and we’ve seen how well those can pan out sometimes (Jamaal Charles). Nobody here can definitively say that RG3 will be a better pro than Stanzi, which is why I’m totally against the idea of trading the boat for RG3. He’s a flashy player and the cool name right now, and admittedly I love the guy, but we’re way too lacking in depth to go all in for him.

If whoever our starting QB doesn’t pan out right away next year, at least we have somebody with potential to turn to, which is a hell of a lot more than we’ve had before. If that doesn’t work out, a certain USC QB will be available next year.

A certain USC QB will be available next year...if we want to trade up for him.

See how that works? It’s always “we can get a QB next year,” and when next year rolls around he’s out of reach. THERE HAVE BEEN 28 NEXT YEARS. And counting.

I have hope for Stanzi, but the reality is that 32 GMs and their scouting staffs passed him to the fifth round, and I trust their collective judgment more than my own when it comes to football. There’s definitely a chance he works out, but it’s not a big enough chance to mortgage the team with.

I'll never deny that I want us to have a 1st round QB.

I just don’t believe in brute forcing our way to one and sacrificing potentially several future starters by unloading draft picks. The good teams didn’t do that, they had their guy fall to them. We’ve been really unfortunate to not have that opportunity, but I’m sure it will come. Waiting definitely sucks though.

28 years, man. There's no such thing as a 28 year plan. And "next year" is no plan at all.

Waiting around doesn’t work. You realize how many great “trenches” and “depth” we’ve wasted in 28 years?

The window may be closing on the Jets, who moved up with a sense of urgency.

The way Pioli works it, the trend has been upwards, with some serious injury setbacks in a year with no offseason. There are numerous examples of teams that go nuts for The Guy, and when one thing goes wrong with the meticulous plan, you lose a year or more, and end up having to go even MORE nuts down the road, because the window’s closing. What you WANT is an approach to personnel that keeps your team on an even keel.

So we have to try to get the right QB.

Sanchez was a gamble because of his very few number of college starts. RG3 would be a gamble because of the system he plays in. Pioli has to do his job and evaluate.

How is trading, say, three draft picks for a QB any more of a delicate “meticulous plan” than using those three picks on a first round tackle who may bust (or “succeed” at guard) plus two mid-round guys who have an even higher chance of failure? If you do your QB evaluation right, neither way is a lot more or less risky than the other. Odds are that you go for a QB and you end up empty-handed, or you use the same picks on linemen and you end up with one or maybe two mid-level cogs. We can get mid-level cogs next year…..

I know you like to build teams from the bottom up, fill in the lines, then go for skill players. But that’s very tough to do and risky, as well. Look around the league and count the number of truly top-shelf QBs (4-5?), and then compare that with the number of 2003 Chiefs type O lines (1-2?). I could argue that it takes LESS pure luck to find that QB gem than to put together an awesome O line. And then there’s the factor of a QB lasting for ten years or so while a great line might stay together for maybe five or six if you’re lucky. We get a great O-line, then we draft a great QB prospect, the O-line will be on its last legs about when that QB just starts hitting his stride.

Hey now. Not every Midwesterner is an Iowegian.

We’re a diverse people, not like in California where everyone is either a movie star or a hippie.

Sometimes Football means nothing

Just ask the Philbin family. Just horrible.

and thus the reason for this ...

http://www.acmepackingcompany.com/2012/1/9/2695094/sympathies-to-philbin-and-packers-fans-everywhere

Thanks for posting that

As a Father, it’s unimaginable. I watched my parents go through it when my 28 year old brother, ironically, drowned.

I will never, ever forget what it did to my Mother.

It will always be my wish that I die before my children.

Again, condolences to the entire family.

Joel!! This is Day 2 & still everyone is TEBOW crazy! I.E. below!

’Bama quarterback A.J. McCarron took by the “Lesticles.”

He went all Tim Tebow on this championship game. He did what nobody expected and few thought him capable of, and was the key element in yet another Crimson Tide national championship.
&
Tim Tebow says Tom Brady may be a prophet

A Prophet?!! He is taking this too far! If anything, Tom Brady will be Gabriel This weekend! Go Pats!! Put an end to all this TeaBag talk so I can watch ESPN in peace!! Amen!

Brady will win handily

But the Tebow talk won’t go away for about a week after.

I don't think the "Tebow talk" will EVER go away.
When it finally goes away I'll finally have time to...

clean up all the vomit from the past 3 months.

+1111111111111111

He hasn’t proven anything,… still inconsistent in throwing the ball! Has the longest release possible. I’ll go out on a limb and say he’ll never win a championship…. But I have te same feeling about Cassel. We do need an Franchise QB

It's amazing.

I can’t believe how defense’s play him. The Chiefs did everything right in both games with the exception of the one deep bomb to Decker. NFL D’s should know by now that yes, he can make plays when you leave him one-on-one coverage where he just throws it up and yes, he can make throws against prevent defense. If you just play regular defense and give and take on the running game they don’t score and don’t move the ball.

Can't really just play regular defense, that is what kills the defense

Have to pretty much play QB contain with your edge rushers(like we did with Hali and Houston), force Tebow to beat you with his arm IN the pocket against man coverage.

Tebow was even worse against us when he got out of the pocket.

The guy can’t read a defense and it’s evident when he scrambles. You can tell his first read isn’t there and now it’s sandlot time. The Steelers went full tilt against the run and kept getting burned by the one-on-one’s in coverage. It was the opposite in the Bears game. They shut him down the entire game and then all of sudden in the fourth they decide to play 10-15 yards off of receivers and move down the field making combine throws.

Yes but that is when the WRs can break off of their routes to move WITH Tebow and that is when the big plays usually happen

The Bears went into a very soft cover 2 at the end of the game, instead of the man coverage they were playing all game.

but the Steelers let him roll out left

on that 3rd &12 in the second quarter because Harrison bit on the look to the right side and moved down the line. Tebow can throw moving left, but is horribly inaccurate moving to his right. The Steelers did everything wrong against Tebow on those big plays. You can’t let the receivers run free off the line, and you most certainly can’t let them get behind the safeties. When Tebow does complete a pass, you gotta tackle the receiver and make him do it again. Oh, well, Denver is off to New England.

2 things

One on of the big passes Polamalu bit on the play-action so badly he looked like Donald Washington.

Carr and Flowers are better than Pitt’s corners

And the Chiefs sent enough defenders to keep Tebow uncomfortable.

You have to give a Polamalu some read responsibility, and the run threats were strong enough, he was almost obliged to bite. That clumsy read-option gives pause to defenders. Man coverage was the key to not giving Tebow enough time to FIND the WRs coming open. Defenders were better spent keeping Tebow uncomfortable, and stuffing the run. Man-off stuff gives Tebow something to read pre-snap. He knows where his guy’s gonna be, if you don’t press at the line.

Plus he probably felt obliged to help his all-backup D line.

KC also did a better job of containing Tebow from rolling out. Familiarity helped there, I’m sure.

Listening to the triangle strategy that DJ talked about where they contained Tebow with three guys, I wonder if it wouldn’t work even better to use four guys and send that extra person on an all-out blitz. Make it a different guy every time – ILB, safety, even could have the NT abandon two-gap occasionally and just try to get into the backfield. I think that would force Tebow into some turnovers. Of course, we’d need our awesome corners in coverage to make it happen.

Other pretty good QB's have had big wind ups.

Honestly, they need to forget about it and just work on his accuracy (which it looks like they had in that playoff game).

As if it’s kept him from winning. Psh. Much ado about not much.

Is it me, or is there something wrong about this statement?

Dexter McCluster says Crennel has a unique way of motivating millionaire athletes to give that extra effort.
If Millions don’t motivate you! Go play for the New York Jets!! or give someone who will play for the league min and for the love of the game, who doesn’t take it for granted!

No QB with 1st Pick

Crennel will draft a LB in the first rd to shore up the defense. If the LB from ASU does well in the combine I can see us selecting him. Pioli will use free agency to address our line needs.

No to Burfict, dude is a headcase
Hightower, Kuechly, and Burflict

If we go ILB with the 1st pick, I prefer they look at them in that order.

I like Hightower

he played an awesome game last night.

He should drop to the second due to not being that fast

Perfect fit for us at SILB however, and has done everything at Bama. Blitzed/played the run/in coverage

Perfect fit for us at SILB however, and has done everything at Bama. Blitzed/played the run/in coverage

In a 3-4

In a Pro system

coached by Nick Saban

“Perfect fit” might be an understatement ;-)

2nd is earlier than Pioli's gone for LB, so far.

While I’d hate to see a 1st spent on a LB, Pioli’s been disciplined enough to “get away” with a 2nd on the likes of Hightower. But he won’t be as much help as some think in coverage, and might not be any factor in nickel and dime. So do you want a LB that high, when he’s only getting half the snaps? Teams like Alabama make the job of LB a lot easier. Can KC re-create those conditions?

Unless you count the top 10 pick in ILB Mayo
Agreed. I love Hightower, but with the state of this team I'd almost rather see us take a great D line prospect with our high second rounder.
I liked what I saw from Hightower...

in the National Championship. Especially the 4th down sack late where he was lined up at end. A guy like that could at an interesting dimension to our D. I still think we’ll go offense although the only real thing I see them doing is taking a lineman. Pioli doesn’t have the balls to trade up I don’t believe but he did have the balls to take Tyson Jackson at #3 so maybe I’m wrong.

Perfect!

Crazy is what I want in a linebacker

Yeah let's get a LB who will give away free yards in our bend-don't-break defense.. perfect fit!.. not

haha

Totally worth the 15 yards if a QB leaves the field on a stretcher
Then Burfict gets fined and gets to sit on his ass on the sidelines/at home because of the NFL rules

So worth a high pick.. haha

Bullshit, give me James Harrison any damn day of the week
That's a rusher not a ILB

Of course Harrison is going to hit the QB, like Hali.. Harrison doesn’t have a ton of late calls where he loses his cool and smashes a guy out of bounds or on the ground

a guy like Burfict put the fear of God into qbs across the league

and makes arrowhead stadium into the 9th circle of hell for opposing teams like it used to be.

Riiight cause he is out of position, or out of the game cause he sucks in coverage

But now and then he will blow up with a late hit, and give away free yards.. I bet QBs are going to fear him

Justin Houston sucked in coverage initially, and was constantly out of position

a lot of the stuff you mention can be corrected with good coaching, something that is non-existent @ AZ St. after he gets hit in his wallet a few times, his personal fouls would decrease. This team needs a menacing, intimidating presence @ ILB.

Excpet Justin Houston's job in the NFL will only rarely require pass coverage

Burfict would compete with Belcher (who is terrible in pass coverage) and will be asked to drop back A LOT more often than Houston

Houston hasn't blown up costing us games like Burfict likely will

Houston did his job damn well in college, Burfict has huge holes in his game. Houston dropped due to weed, Burfict will drop because he is out of his mind. Not the same player

So was Ray Lewis

I think Romeo can control him.

Ray had good play to back it up

Burfict has regressed and is either playing timid/horrible ball, or blowing up and getting benched

Anyone hear Jeff Chadiha tlaking shit this morning

National media doens’t seem to be buying into the “In Pioli we trust” mantra

What'd he say?
Pioli has two years left in KC unless the Chiefs win the division

That the Bears and Colts dumping their GMs (both who went to the Super Bowl) sets a precedent for firing GMs that aren’t performing. That RAC was a hire that allows Pioli to control his GM. Dude didn’t think too highly of the guy to say the least.

RAC was a hire that allows Pioli to control.. himself? haha

Bears have put a lot of stock in the Cutler trade and massive FA.. aging all over and a lot of holes left, not really a surprise he was released

Colts gm.. well their drafting as of late has not been good, and there was no option beyond Manning, you have to be prepared for those injuries..

How is it news that people who aren't performing get fired?

Chadia has issues with Pioli, and is clearly very biased. When we start winning, he’ll look like the tool he is. The hell. We won the division year two of his tenure. Things are going the right way.

But, since he agrees with H2E, he’s obviously 100% correct and has 100% inside info.

BS.

He doesn't agree with me

I like RAC and to a lesser extent, Pioli. Its a safe but unsexy hire. My problem is with the 5’5" bitch cutting the checks.

The notion that there is some national conspiracy against Pioli is absurd.

I didn't say there was a conspiracy.

I said Chadiha has it out for Pioli.

Winning cures it all. Do that and there will be no questions.

Chadiha has a hard on for bashing Pioli.

Gotta have a guy you hate out there. He probably cut a buddy of his.

dude is so full of shit.

predicted that mcdaniels would be our hc. definitely has an axe to grind.

Yeah, lol.

Pretty much everything he’s said has been totally wrong. We didn’t even ask for permission to interview McDumbiels; that’s in spite of everyone saying he was coming here.

Barely Wright, Fescoe, Kietzman, Petro, Parkins, etc.

ALL OF THEM. fail

One I noticed wasn't on here was from ESPN with a link to one of our own articles

http://espn.go.com/blog/afcwest/post/_/id/38449/who-will-be-crennels-qb
Pretty cool we got a “shoutout” from ESPN.

No mention of former Chief...

Lake Dawson getting GM interviews?

It was a front page item a couple days ago.
Cool. Didn't catch it.
HAHA

Was out of town last week without internet access and was just able to start reading AP again…

Insert foot in mouth, then repeat.

Not a big deal. So much content is pumped out anymore it's hard to keep track even if you check in every day.
terrible hire

wow… just speachless here

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Arrowhead Pride to post a comment.