SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Arrowhead Pride

Texans Vs. Ravens Open Thread

The Houston Texans visit the Baltimore Ravens this afternoon in the AFC divisional round of the 2012 NFL playoffs. The Ravens are favored to win the game.

The New England Patriots beat the Denver Broncos on Saturday so the winner of this will play in New England next weekend.

I'm taking the Ravens. Who are you taking?

0 recs  |  515 comments

Comments

The Ravens can win all they want

Just not by 8 :-)

Texans

Just because I’m a huge Arian Foster fan..the guys awesome

and proof you don't need to take RB's in the first round
Don't need to draft them at all, apparently.
Yates

Rooting for him. To bad he doesn’t openly flaunt his beliefs, or the guy could have had a whole week of disappointing buildup. I’ll say Ravens by 9.

No way the Ravens cover.
probably not

just thought i would try and Jonah Steve’s line :)

I also picked the Texans in the preseason to go to the Super Bowl.
Deirdorf looks like a Shar Pei
He

and Fouts are my absolute least favorite announcers for Chiefs games.

I don't mind Dierdorf.
Do you mind nails on a chalkboard?
that statement makes my ears cringe
Now you know how I feel about Dierdork.
More than Aikman?
The worst is Joe Buck...

How that asshole has that job, but doesn’t understand the difference between an end around and a reverse is beyond me.

his dad?
But his dad didn't call football games...

Joe Buck is much less bad during baseball games.

I guess Jack did call some football too
I couldn't remember
That applies to about 95% of announcers.
doesn’t understand the difference between an end around and a reverse
Its one of my biggest pet peeves
That

and the confusion between pass interference, illegal contact and defensive holding.

That doesn't bother me as much...

I also hate it when a replay is shown a hundred times and announcers spend too much time looking at the feet to not see a knee was down.

Please don't make me choose.
You have too!
many options?
Tebow thinks so
Not enough for him.
maybe that is why he looks confused
And sounds like a dork.

Hence, Dierdork.

sounds like the name of an elf
Setting the tone.
It's strange that you don't see more FB dives in short yardage situations.

It’s a quick handoff to a big guy that already has a couple steps of steam. Just makes sense.

I don't know why more teams don't run those off guard instead of over center...

Or do what you said out of the offset I

Ravens are inconsistent.

But they’re as good as any team in the AFC when they come to play. And they should come to play this week. This is the week were the Texans really miss their starting QB.

I don't trust the Ravens offense at all... Or this guy.

For a long stretch of games, I agree.

But for one game, when they’re very focused, I do.

Meh...

inconsistency doesn’t care about the situation. It rears its head randomly.

you don't trust Ernie?

what’d he ever do to break your trust in him!

He stole my Rubber duckie when I was a kid thats me though
lol Kris Wilson td
Secret weapon!
Kris Wilson ?

our Kris Wilson

yup
Damn all those guys we missed on, turn out

fabulous

I thought Kris Wilson would have been much better than he was...

I wonder if playing behind Tony G for so long just stunted his development.

Yeah kind of like Brad Cottam.
I never had high expectations for him.

Kris Wilson was such an athletic freak coming out of college.

Is he the "original" Hybrid?
Tony Gonzalez?
Wilson

H-Back

Id give that nod to Kleinsasser
I wouldn't say that considering it was his first catch of the entire season...

you just don't get it

Like I said...

Secret weapon!

How'd they manage to keep a lid on that for 17 weeks is beyond me.

You’d think Pioli was running the Ravens franchise.

They think that far in advance.

How epic would a Ravens 49ers rematch be in the Super Bowl.

would anybody score?
oh you meant brothers
Who has more TD's this week, Kris Wilson or Gronkowski?
Grono had two yesterday i might be wrong
Flacco is looking

Elite

Flacco reminds me of Kyle Boller but a little bit better.
Tom Brady vs Alex Smith would be an awesome Matchup
How can a show be "A New Hit Comedy" after one episode?
emphasis on NEW
I watched about half of Rob... and it was about as bad as all his shitty movies.
Bring back Rob Petrie
They did ........

he is on ME TV

Laura Petrie: Rob, you’re not well.
Robert ‘Rob’ Petrie: Laurie, I’m perfectly all right.
Laura Petrie: Really? Then how come you can’t out-wrestle a 112-pound woman?
Robert ‘Rob’ Petrie: Because I’m not really trying, that’s why.
Laura Petrie: [pinning him down] Try.
Robert ‘Rob’ Petrie: All right, you want to play around? Okay.
[tries to get up, but Laurie keeps him pinned down]
Robert ‘Rob’ Petrie: Okay, Gorgeous George, knock it off. All right, so you’re stronger than me; what does that prove?
Laura Petrie: It proves you’re sick.

hmm good article on Flynn and Packers on PFT

Chiefs need to give up a 4th round pick and work out a sign/trade deal for Flynn!

Won't he be a FA so unless Packers franchise him, they can't trade him
from the article
Unless, of course, a team desperate to secure "dibs" on Flynn works discreetly with the Packers to set up a sign-and-trade scenario that allows Flynn to receive a fair contract, to go to his desired destination, and to allow the Packers to get some compensation for developing the seventh-rounder into one of the hottest names on the free-agent market.
I believe thats called tampering
The Packers would be tampering with their own guy?
they are sneaky that way
That's why they always win

except against the Chiefs.

I misread it.

But it doesn’t make any sense. For one why would Flynn do this? And two if a team is that desperate why would they sign him and give up a draft pick, when they could just sign him.

if they work out a deal before he goes to FA

they don’t have to worry about him signing with another team.

but I agree, I don’t know why Flynn would agree to it instead of just seeing what he’s worth in the open market.

But it comes down to giving up money and picks.

In the long run its cheaper to just give up the money

I would imagine...

it comes down to about a 4 or 5 team bidding war, and I doubt that any of them are that good, so its probably going to just come down to money.

With the slot system on the draft now, draft picks are more valuable than ever.

Dan Snyder vs himself
I have no idea why Flynn would do that.

Doesn’t make any sense to me either. I think his signing bonus would count against the Packers too, which makes it less likely they’d want to.

It all depends on how the signing bonus was drafted...

you could change it to a roster bonus, all kinds of clever wording that could change how the bonus is applied.

thought it was only tampering

if you contacted a player under contract, not a team

Hottest?

When did they write that about Orton?

neck beards aren't hot?
I guess I don't understand the NFL FA rules... in that scenario, Chiefs should be able to trade Carr even though he's a FA too. I'll have to go read the article
If I were Flynn, I would know I could make more money on the open market as a FA so I wouldn't sign a deal with GB at less money

just so they could get a mid-rd draft pick and trade me somewhere

They cant trade Flynn

and we cant trade Carr unless they are franchised tagged and signed deal. Without that they both go wherever they want to go.

the point was...

that GB would resign Flynn then trade him… Which is very unlikely

I agree, Shefter stated they were unlikely to frachise him anyway
SO who is the new Backup GB QB?

wouldn’t it make more sense to re-sign him?

Are we going to talk about the Houston Texans during the GB game?

Why would it make sense to resign him?

He’s going to demand starter money based on his small sample, and he will get it because a team will pay it.

so

Flynn
Orton
Campbell

all are going to be starters somewhere in the nfl

along with

Luck
Manning
and
RGIII

?

I doubt all those guys will be starters.

I still think Indy keeps Peyton and drafts Luck… And I also doubt Campbell will be a starter next year.

He might be a better option for at least two teams in the AFC West
You think

Indy will have over $50M tied up in QBs next year?

does anyone on that team deserve the money more?
That's not the point.

The worst team in the NFL cannot afford to tie up that much money in one position.

If Manning bounces back they won't be the worst team in the NFL
Well

I assume their goal is more lofty than just not being the worst team in the NFL.

But the logic is (not that I agree with it)

Before Manning went down they were a Super Bowl contender, without Manning they are a terrible team, when Manning comes back they will be a Super Bowl contender again.

I think it's obvious now

that they’re not a legitimate Super Bowl contender, even with Manning. He helped mask some of their problems that are now painfully obvious. And I think cutting ties with Polian indicates they’re ready for a fresh start, and not satisfied with false hope.

Irsay doesn't strike me as the most rational owner
I'll have to agree with you.............

AGAIN

I wish the Chiefs would tie up 50 Million in QB money

not to Manning though

Careless Whispers

to

Drew Brees Agent might get a Deal done :)

I'm sure he'd take a $50M signing bonus.
For one year?

Who do you think the Chiefs should spend $50M on next year?

Tebow
Sure

but he’s not a free agent.

This...

Its an investment. They can get more for Manning if he proves he is healthy. And if Manning comes back and they don’t miss a beat, then who cares.

But why pay him 35 Million for one season.

Because you aren’t going to sit Luck for two years are you?

How is Manning going to make 35 million?

And how will Luck make 15 million in his first year?

he has close to 30 million in roster bonus due

mid March

Manning is due a $28M roster bonus.

That’s in addition to his yearly salary.

Cam Newton received a $14,518,000 signing bonus last year. Certainly Luck will get more than that.

Signing bonus is spread out over 4 years

His cap number is 4 million this year

Cam Newton that is
It's spread out over the cap.

That doesn’t mean the money paid is spread out over the life of the contract. Otherwise, what would be the point of not just making it salary?

because its still guaranteed
You can guarantee salary too.
I don't think that is true
Cam Newton's entire contract is guaranteed.

Not just the signing bonus he received.

Link

by those numbers

Cam Newton is making 4 million, not 15.

Did you miss the signing bonus?

We’re talking about what Luck will make in 2012.

the signing bonus is the bulk of his contract this year

His salary is 375K, and his signing bonus for this year is 3.6 million.

Luck won’t make much more than Newton did, the slotting system won’t let it get out of hand.

Luck will make about $17M

and Peyton will make about $35M. Hence, “do you think the Colts will tie up about $50M in one position this year?”

Luck will not make 17 million year one.

Teams do not pay all the singing bonus in one year.

Yes they do.

Again, why do you think they even have a signing bonus? I already demonstrated that all of Cam’s contract is guaranteed. So why split some of it off as a signing bonus?

You’re confusing cap hit, which IS spread out over the life of the contract, vs. when the money actually changes hands.

But its not...

the link you sent me clearly shows its split over 4 years.

I don’t know why it is the case with the Newton contract since apparently his whole contract is guaranteed, probably because its not that much considering he’s the first pick.

But that signing bonus is spread out over 4 years. Its clear as day on that link YOU posted.

Cap hit

is a reflection of what the player makes that year. Why would the NFL allow the cap hit to be spread out if they are going to spend all the money initially.

Bonuses are never spread out.

Or they wouldn’t be bonuses. Lucks signing bonus is like Mannings roster bonus. It’s paid upfront.

I imagine that came from the players.

It benefits them to get more money up front.

Here you can see

Link

Bradfords wasn’t

Bradfords signing bonus was paid year two.
Signed a six-year, $78 million contract. The deal contains $50 million guaranteed, including all six years’ base salaries, a $2.88 million first-year roster bonus, and a second-year “signing” bonus of $17.974 million
exactly

his wasn’t spread out, which is why the Rams took the hit in year two

Which means at the start of the league year in year two of his contract he was paid 17.9M$ upfront

Then received his salary cheques every week over the course of the season.

right...

And it shows that on his contract information… But Cam Newtons is spread out over 4 years, like it shows on his contract information

Cam Newton got a 14M$ signing bonus upfront

But as far as cap hit it’s spread out over the life of the contract. You can’t really compare Newtons last year to anything done before because with the new CBA these contracts are going to be set up differently. In cash though he was still paid that bonus up front.

This is fucking ridiculous

why would the NFL allow the money to be spread out if, the money was paid now?

It's called a contract.

Some things are put in to benefit the players. Not everything in the CBA is for the owners’ benefit.

Oh its called a contract?

So spreading a singing bonus out over 4 years wouldn’t be to the teams benefit?

So you're saying it benefits both sides.

And yet you’re asking why they would allow it?

the argument works both ways

it also benefits to pay it out over 4 years

That would certainly benefit owners.

Not so much the players, who benefit by receiving more money up front. As I said.

but the money is still

guaranteed, where the contracts are not. Which benefits the players also

You forget.

The players fought hard against having a salary cap at all. Obviously the owners had to throw them some bones in order to get a deal done. They weren’t going to be able to just implement an all pro-owner salary cap.

http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2012/1/15/2709088/texans-vs-ravens-2012#88787751

I didn't forget

I don’t see how it applies.

That's the breakdown of the cap hit.

Okay, explain to me why there is any such thing as a signing bonus, if it’s all spread out just like salary.

Because not all salarys

are guaranteed.

But the singing bonus are.

I give up.

CAM NEWTON’S ENTIRE CONTRACT IS GUARANTEED.

SAM BRADFORD GOT $50M GUARANTEED. IT WASN’T ALL IN A SIGNING BONUS.

WOW!

Im not arguing this.

Im arguing that it is spread out. Because it clearly is.

One last time and then I'm done.

Since all of Cam Newton’s contract is guaranteed, why is some of it called signing bonus and some of it called base salary? Keeping mind that any or all of base salary can be guaranteed. (And is, in this case.)

All of his contract is guaranteed

because its only 22 million. It could be for some reason if Newton is cut so they can defer some of it later, and pay some of it now. I really don’t know, and I doubt you do either.

Actually, I do.

Look at the bottom of the comments. The signing bonus is paid in a lump sum, as I said.

It doesnt really matter what the cap hit is.

They’re still forking over 15+2-3M for him next year.

Manning has a 28M$ bonus being paid at the start of the league year + 7.5 in salary for the season.

Last year Cam Newtons signing bonus was 14.5M plus his couple million in salary. And if you’re trying to prove that Manning is healthy so you can trade him next year you might get what? One 1st for him? Or you cut him now, save 35M$ and get a 3rd rounder for him next year for comp pick.

If Manning his healthy he brings back more than one 1st
Not a chance.

Especially when the whole league knows you have to trade him. By then a 37 year old QB who has a serious injury history now with his neck being traded by a team who HAS to get rid of him won’t draw much more then a 1st rounder.

You underestimate the stupidity of some teams...

And I don’t see why Manning wouldn’t be open to renegotiating his contract, he didn’t want all that money in the first place.

What benefit is it to him to renegotiate?

So he gets one more year with the Colts? He knows they arent going to sit Luck for more then one season so he would be out the season after anyway. If Polian was there then maybe but I doubt it now. Also that team, even with him, might not even be a playoff contender. He wants to win. That team isn’t winning anything next year even with him.

Because if he is trying to prove his worth...

his best chance at proving it might be with the Colts. He isn’t going to be able to go to a new team and have the same system, or freedom he has in Indy.

So he proves his worth next year with the Colts

Then gets traded to a team that he has no say in and costs his new team a pick or multipe picks? That doesn’t seem to be worth it.

I don't think the Colts would do that to him

At this point, its not like Peyton would care if a team is going to mortgage the future to win now.

The only guy who had allegiance to him is out of the building now.

I’ll be shocked if he isnt released before the start of the league year. The only alternative I can see is if he agrees to renegotiate his contract in exchange for being traded to a team he approves of this offseason. And considering we supposedly looked into trading for him last offseason we still might be in the mix in a trade scenario this year.

Irsay doesn't have allegiance to Peyton

If it wasn’t for Peyton, that team wouldn’t have gotten a new stadium and would have been moved to LA.

Irsay is a business man

I don’t think he has any allegiance to him. Alot of what you just said is in past tense which is how Irsay will look at it too.

That organization

owes everything it has to Peyton, and they aren’t going to fuck him because of it.

I think you underestimate what business people will to in the name of "business decisions".
We are talking about the same

guy who forced Peyton to take more money

That was Polian.

Trying to protect the paper legacy that Peyton was propping up.

So you think Indy is going to pay 50M$ to thei QBs next year?
It takes two to tango.
wouldn’t it make more sense to re-sign him?

I imagine he wants to start, and wants to get starter money. And he probably will.

I hate backup qbs that think they can start
Ahhhh

Now we are talking!

Yeah what the hell was that Steve Young asshole thinking
There is a case for a few but steve young was brought in to replace Montana
Aaron Rodgers too
So you like backup QBs

who lack confidence and a competitive will?

Dammit Tarkus

Don’t go putting words in peoples Mouths

Huh?

He said he hates backups who think they can start. Every QB in the NFL should have that attitude. If not, they either lack confidence in themselves, or they lack a competitive spirit.

Moneyball taught me that if they have ugly girlfriends they lack confidence

So Brodie Croyle should be a starter

yeah. The story is poising the ridiculous idea that GB would sign Flynn to a multi-year deal and then trade him, which makes no sense
Refs should throw a flag

on Flaccos foo man choo

What a terrible read by Yates.
When does the "Good" game start?
Is Delhomme going to make an appearance this game?
Great blitx pick up there
Need a Ben Tate sighting
Wow, Yates waaay telegraphed that one.

Lucky it wasn’t picked.

Pollard strikes

Damn another one that

got away

Pollard still playing yep just gave up a big play
Yea I dont miss that and missed tackles
The Houston Center is a Free Agent
Already?

You’d think that would happen in the off season

If Pioli has't been able to get either Carr or Bowe signed by this point I doubt he overpays for a FA lineman

He’ll go for a Mike Goff type instead

thank gawd there is only ONE Mike Goff
Myers will more then likely be back in Houston

They would be dumb to let him go. If the Chiefs don’t like Hudson at center moving forward then a guy that I would like to see brought in(alot cheaper then Myers) is Scott Wells from GB.

I think they need to play Hudon at C next year to prove he can't handle it before bringing in a FA to bury him on the depth chart

I think he can handle the job

Flacco

God dang he’s one funny looking dude.

Nice lil hold, there.
What a strange, Haleyesque challenge.
more air time for Pollard
And people were actually mad we let this guy walk?
Houston is a feast or famine running offense

they either get huge chunks of yards or nothing

Great grab from foster
That was a hell of a catch
Foster aint going quietly
Damn that Goal line must be bullet-proof
Anyone know if RB#3 Derrick Ward for Texans is a FA this off season?

He’d be a good complement to Charles

Free agent but 31 years old.

I’ve always liked him as a depth back but he’s hitting that age where things go south.

yeah, but not much wear on the tires the past two years. Ronnie Brown is another guy that had a season to heal up this year
True enough

Only about 200 carries total over the last 3 seasons.

Anyone notice how Terrance Cody's been playing? I've been watching the Texans offence when they'd had the balll to this point
Anyone else want to see a niners-ravens Super Bowl?

Two of the best defences in the game, plus it’s two brothers coaching against each other in the Super Bowl.

Would be about as boring as the BCS Championship

I don’t see how the Niners make it though. If it wasn’t for the Saints shooting themselves in the foot early, the Saints would’ve run away with the game.

Jamaal Charles...

got 82 yards with 9 carries against the baltimore D. If it wasn’t for Matt Cassel, he probably would have had broken 150 yards with 10 more carries. I am very excited to see Charles run over every team we play next year as he always does.

Watt is beastin
Yeah

a guy like Watt would elevate our D to another level with berry and siler also coming back.

Man, Watt would look nice opposite TJax.
Yup, dude gets upfield fast.

But that’s the Phillips 3-4… I don’t see him eating up double teams.

Dorsey isn't asked to eat up double teams much in our D either.

Crennel uses him more as a one gap guy on that side, although that may be because he knows he can’t stand up to double teams all day so he’s adjusted to play to Glenns strengths.

Didn't see that double team on that Dickson play right now?
Yeah

With Houston and Hali coming off the edges, the Oline would need to be perfect against our D…

Yeah, I think it's time to move Dorsey for whatever pioli can get in return and plug in a bigger (taller) DE opposite TJax
Now would be the time to do it with Brockers declaring.

Or maybe Allen Bailey can be that guy. He started to really come around late in the year. You would think there would be some interest in Dorsey from 4-3 teams and he’s probably still worth a midrounder.

Would love to see

Bailey get more snaps. Hate to think that trading Dorsey to a 4-3 will allow him to have a greater effect than he ever had with us, but I guess it would be a win win scenario.

Why not just keepDorsey for the final year
how do u feel about T jack
Because he isn't worth anything to us next year

If we can get a 4th rounder for him now then we at least get something. Of course I guess you could hope he walks and really has an amazing season with his name and get a 3rd round comp pick but I would rather have a 4th now.

I think the Chiefs would be a better team with him this year

than a 3-4 round pick.

then we can decide to sign or franchise him

We have Bailey and can re-sign Gordon who was very good in spot duty this year.

I don’t think we’re that much better this year with him and it would come at a cost of getting a younger, more appropriate player at that position getting snaps.

and spend our 1st round pick on that?

CMON MAN

You really don't need to replace him with anything more then Bailey and Gordon if you dont want to.
and get totally run over by Denver and Oakland

Pitt Baltimore and Cleveland with Trent Richardson

no thanks

a 3rd round pick is not worth losing 7 games next year

on a Bailey and a prayer

If we're losing 7 games next year then we have more problems then just DE.
Your trade would create more problems than benefit
How so?

We would trade a player at a position that we can afford to lose, gain a draft pick to get a player to develop in another position of need and save about 4.5M$.

I would be perfectly comfortable with Gordon over Dorsey going into next year.

You could make a very good argument that Gordon > Dorsey this year.

is gordon signed for 2012

I don’t think so

Do you really think there will be a huge market for him?

I think that’s an easy re-sign.

How can you make this claim?

Gordon didn’t nearly have the same snaps as Dorsey.

I dont think

we are going to get run over by anyone next year.

Add Berry and Siler to our D which has already shown great potential and a possibility to be a top 3 Defense next year.

Proven play over we Hope is not a good plan Guys
dorsey had a good year this year

stat wise

I don't like stats.

I like what I see with my eyes and this year he was hot and cold and got absolutely no pressure on the QB. In his only start in place of Dorsey, Gordon had a better game then Dorsey put up all year.

I don't like football stats

because they are inconclusive

Football stats are worthless without context.

When you put the two together they make sense but honestly football isn’t baseball.

So I guess Dorsey is better than anyone else

since he played more damn snaps than anyone else for the Chiefs at 3-4 DE

Last year he did

That wasn’t the case this year. I think your way overvalueing Dorsey here. Where’s Kalo when I need 2 cents.

I repeat he played more 3-4 DE snaps than anyone else

of course I meant Chiefs players

I don't think you can say that Gilbeery or Bailey would have had twice the stats if they playd as many snaps as Dorsey
You are undervaluing his contribution to our team

Run stopper
and Hali and DJ are both Pro-Bowlers cause of Dorsey

I mean some football stats will tell you basic things

but the only stats I put a lot of faith in are football outsiders DVOA and DYAR, and I can’t calculate those so they don’t interest me as much.

Im also not sold on QBR

There are mainstream baseball stats that are far more useless than any football stat…

I think the value we get out of him starting

And allowing our young guys to continue developing>4th round pick

What would be the point? I'd rather upgrade his position this year than keep Dorsey around for the last year of his contract to just too watch him walk next year with no compensation
we have lots of positions that need upgraded first

Weigmann
Lilja
Richardson
NT
maybe CB and or WR

so you'd rather keep a player that's going to be gone next year, rather than trade him this year for a 4th rd pick?

that pick could in turn be used for one of the needs you listed above.

The cost is lost games

We are trying to WIN games not the Draft

b rich and weigs are the big ones
Weigs is replaced by Hudson so just need to draft a RT
You Hope

no guarantees that Hudson is better

To continue to allow our young guys to develop

Bailey isn’t ready and one start from Gordon does not a player make. If we drafted Brockers in the first I’d rather we let him sit a year too, he’s only 21 and growing into his body.

who cares

He would be disruptive in kc defense better than dorsey or tjack ever has btw tjack gates is better than Cassel too

Watt should have went top 10

Seriously such a damn good player.

First time commenting

Off topic of the game. I would like manning here not as a qb but as a QB coach. He is young enough to put the pads on and show what to do and what to look for etc. instead of pictures and films alone. Thoughts about that

Would

love to see us drafting Kellen Moore and have him work under Manning.

NFL Salary Cap
Say, for example, a player wants a seven-year, $60-million contract. Let’s say that the owner decides to give that player an $11-million signing bonus, which is all paid out in the first year but gets factored into the cap as prorated over the course of the seven-year contract ($11-million / 7 years = $1.57-million per year).


Link

Because salaries have continued to grow at a rate outpacing the salary cap, teams have found ways to circumvent the cap. Signing bonuses don’t count toward a team’s cap for a given year. A player who receives a signing bonus gets more money for that year than his recorded “salary,” leaving more room in the cap for the other players.
This should end the conversation.
Why do I think it won't?
Because this is still AP right?
I have so many more questions and counterpoints

but they’ve all been said before, so I don’t see the point in rehashing them.

maybe you could explain MLB rules?

that should take a week or so

Just turned the game on

and it’s cutting out every 5 seconds. Boo Cox.

do u think there is any chance brees becomes a free agent
Is there a number less then zero?
Negative Zero?
square root of zero.
Infinity and Beyond

works both ways

Is there a number less than zero that isn't negative I can use?
u don't think brees wants to atleast listen to what teams might offer him.

kinda like what bowe and carr might do

Not a chance.

Have you read that KC Start article? KC has nothing to offer.

Star**

(sorry, cable cutting out is throwing me off my game)

He might want to listen

But he won’t get a chance to. Franchisetagville for Brees.

I don't think it takes that long

I imagine a deal gets done before they have to Franchise him.

if they tag brees would u still trade for him 2 first rd picks
I would.
without hesitation
Sadly, Pioli wouldn't...
And then sign him to a 7 year 100M$+ deal.
of course

and it will be spread over 7 years, cept that 1st part :)

Tag AG your it

What could another team possibly offer him to make him think about moving?

He is a god in that town.
He has a great coach.
He leads an offense that just helped him break the all-time passing record for a QB

Do you really think another team could even hope to lure him away by offering him 18 million instead of 15?

if it was a right situation and a huge amount of dough some off the wall contract that the saints can't match i say yes he would consider it big time
I don't think there is a "righter" situation though
This ^

He is just as likely to win more Super Bowls with the Saints as he is anyone else.

A defense?

and possibly more SB rings

This is true

Brees with the Chiefs D and with all of Chiefs offensive skilled position players?

Chance for multiple championships and a dynasty.

the Chiefs don't have Graham
Chiefs

have Charles, the best RB in the league, Bowe, Breaston, Baldwin, Moeaki, McClain, McCluster, and Battle.

Brees can work well with those players.

Charles and Moeaki are far from sure things...

Baldwin has done nothing, McClain doesn’t have a purpose in a Brees offense, Battle isn’t that good.

McCluster could be dangerous with Brees, Bowe might not be back, and Breaston is getting old

You are a Royal Fan :)

Such Negativity

I have more faith in the Royals future than the Chiefs
whereas the Roylas need 3 Standout Pitchers

the Chiefs need Just One

yeah, but the Royals have more offensive firepower than the Chiefs

Plus potential in starting pitching, where as the Chiefs know exactly what they have in “pitching”

This

is truly delusional. There is no way Royals are going to win a championship any time soon. They cannot beat the Rays, Yankees, Rangers, Tigers, Angels or the Red Sox in a playoff series. The Yanks and Red Sox are going to keep spending so it doesnt really matter if they get old, and Rays are always going to have better younger players infused with timely veteran hitting because of Joe Maddon and Andrew Friedman. Not to mention the Rangers and Angels are getting better and better.

All the Chiefs need is a QB to become a great team in the NFL.

the funny thing is...

They won’t have to beat the Rays, Yankees, Ragners, Tigers, Angels and the Red Sox in a playoff series.

Disagree

just because Brees plays a certain style with the saints, doesnt mean he can’t play in any other type of offense.

Saying Charles is nothing from a sure thing is tremendously undervaluing the guy, and great QBs are going to get the ball into the WR’s hands. With the WR we have and the mismatches we can create, Brees would break 400 yards passing every game if he wanted to.

you are very dillusional
Dont see how im delusional

Breaston was a great WR for the Cardinals when they had a good QB.
Bowe we all know is a huge offensive threat. Baldwin has showed alot of potential this year and most of his problems seem to be tied to his lack of focus and timing. I would put money that he makes big strides for next year. Moeaki also showed great talent his first year and was very sure handed his first season, not to mention he had the greatest catch in the regular season that year when Cassel overthrew him by a mile in the endzone.

Charles’s rushing averages have been astronomically high since college, and I really dont see why you dont think JC is a sure thing. He singlehandedly carried Cassel to a 10-6 record and a playoff berth last season.

Thats the funny thing about delusional people...
rofl

youll be eating your words next season. Even Orton is going to be successful with Charles back.

You’ll see again the greatness of Jamaal Charles

what words were those exactly?
And

Steven Breaston is only 28 btw

You mean like the mismatches his team creates now?
You mean

with one of the worst QBs in Cassel and definitely the worst QB in Palko? Dont understimate the importance of the QB

i was referring to Brees' current team... ?
?

I am lost as always…

Who Can't stop Alex Smith?

defensively

Or Seattle and Hasselbeck last year
Brees just broke the all-time passing record with the offense he has

Why on earth would he want to come to KC to be coached by Bill Muir (unlikely) or some yet unknown OC?

Why would Manning?

Hell Kansas City is worse than Cleveland and Akron and Detroit rolled into one

I think Manning would almost prefer a weak OC

that way he could do things his way. But yeah, if Manning was uninjured and playing at the top of his game, there’s no way in hell he’d consider KC either.

given the current situation with the colts manning would consider kc alot

the colts are in rebuild and manning got a few years to play if healthy

They want him.

And he wants them.

So no, they’ll get a deal done before it gets to that.

Let's go Texans!

Whoo!

Do the Chiefs get an asterisk?

since we were the orignal Texans :)

Do the Texans get an asterisk for Super Bowl IV?
Ravens vs Texans

Who gets the chance to lose to Tom Brady in the AFC Championship game…

Interesting stat at ESPN

New England hasn’t beat a team with a winning record all year.

Yeah

I saw that stuff run all week over at mile high report. rofl.

Brady looks more focused than ever to win this year. Not betting against Brady.

Packers haven't lost to a team with a winning record all year
I think

49rs defense is similar to our D in terms of their skill talent across the board with great LB and CB who can cover. They also have the luxury of a more consistent pass rush, and I think Packs are going to lose to the 49rs if they beat the giants today.

wasn't really the point
oh

what was your point?

that stats can be misleading
A good defence and a running game... I think Texans could give them a tough match up
Maybe

Brady and his O line looked better than ever against the broncos. Theres a chance Texans or Ravens could be a tough mathcup. But i see both of these teams, especially with their QBs getting overwhelmed by Brady and the Pats in Foxborough early.

I think the only team that stops the Patriots this year are the Giants.

And I need that to happen so my better half doesn’t get angry at me for betting on the Giants to win tonight.

Haha

it’s not likely they’ll win, but it could definitely happen. They do seem to beat teams they aren’t suppose to beat

The odds were right.

I’m counting on them being the healthiest they’ve been all year, the defense coming around and their ability to pressure with their front four to give them a chance. Also Eli has finally turned me into a believer and their 3 WRs might be better then the 3 WRs GB puts on the field.

Did you bet on them to win, or cover?
Win on one bet and cover on my other ticket to cover my ass.
Pollard sighting...
I forgot he played for the Ravens
Wasn't good enough to play for the Chiefs and Texans
did herm cut pollard
I'm glad State Farm finally filmed some new commercials

I was getting sick of the same ole’ Discount Double-Check

Wow. What a D-Line.
Texans aren't missing Mario Williams at all
Did you see him this year?

I’d bet my shirt he’s on his way out of town this offseason.

I did, i moved to Austin TX last spring so I watch them on local TV and Chiefs on computer. He's too big to play OLB in 3-4. Brooks Reed has really progressed well in his place. same with Barwin
I have never seen a player look that awkward in space.

They really should’ve lined him up opposite of Watt or something. What a mess. Considering they had a top 5 defense without him, they have to see how expendable he is now and he still has alot of trade value.

they should be able to get a 1st rd pick for him, of course coming back from an injury might scare some teams
Not really a fit for 3-4 at all
Alright, I haven't ever seen him play, so someone help me out here.

Yates > Cassel ?

Ray Lewis is like a pitbul... He doesn't let go
terrible decision to throw the ball there
All the concern is what happens with Luck/Manning next year...

What happens with Schaub/Yates next year? Clearly Shaub won’t lose his job next year, but how long does Houston hang onto Yates.

Until his contract is up (probably 4 years)
this playing time is very valuable....

even if he is only a career back-up…..its gonna make him some money later down the road

i spoke too soon

he just threw another pick…lol

I would have liked to see what stanzi had to offer.
Schaub has one year left on his contract.
Ed Reed is still the man.
Why does he keep throwing that ball up like that??
He is a 5th round rookie. You would be better off playing Palko than him. :)
oh no....give him more credit than that

he has put 13 points up against the Ravens D….Palko would have -13

Cassel put up what?
who cares...

i dont want either one of them in KC next year

rookies

make rookie mistakes

turnovers are 4-0 and its a one score game?

Good luck in Foxborough Baltimore.

Baltimore is old and on the decline. Houston with Shaub beats them today.
Pittsburgh is old and on the decline.

We get both next year

this just got real
Best FB in the league my ass.
Anyone else watching this game

and thinking even with the mistakes, they would rather have Yates than Cassel?

yea i was thinking that but i might be happy with stanzi
Well,

he does have the 3 interception game / looking down his primary receiver skills. So no.

tj yates

Better than Cassel plz get a real qb in kc flynn yates. Orton anyone but cassel

getting flynn would put us in the exact same scenario as when we got Cassel

Despite popular opinion, Orton is the exact same QB as Cassel, ie a game manager.

But a better game manager.

With a better arm, that can actually read defenses and make progressions.

so

Flynn has expe

Two games against two of the worst passing defenses in the league on a team with offensive weapons that 90% of the league doesnt have.
And a well oiled system with a real play caller.
who cares if he reads the defense if he still throws it straight to them.

At least Cassel has shown he can protect the football

When

has he done that? Ive seen him have absolutely no pocket awareness and get sacked.

2010

27 TDs 7 Ints

yeah

and 0td and 3 int against the ravens, are you kidding me you clearly dont watch Cassel play.

Terrible accuracy, inadequate arm strength, cant read a defense, no pocket awareness, prone to turnovers, lack of pocket awareness, not athletic,cant convert on 3rd downs ever.

He has absolutely nothing going for him other than the fact that he is a “great leader” by being so resilient at sucking.

Small Sample Size FTW!!!
wow

you really dont watch football. Im honestly tired of idiots wanting Cassel to keep playing for the Chiefs.

If you are using one game to prove anything

then you clearly don’t understand anything

No

I just thought by now that people have watched a couple seasons of Cassel and finally realized how crappy of a QB he is.

Ive seen as many seasons of Cassel being good as bad.
No one

is saying Cassel is a great, good, or even average QB. Just saying that Orten is not signficantly better overall. Not sure why you’re not getting this.

Im not saying

Orton is a franchise QB. I dont understand why youre not getting the fact that Cassel is flat out one of the worst QBs in the league, and Orton is not.

Orten's

rating is 81.1, Cassel’s is 76.4 and Orten led us to one touchdown per game like clockwork. Orten is a bad QB who is better then Cassel, but he’s still bad.

Of course comparing 9 games to 3 games

isn’t exactly definitive

Especially when the 3 games

was on a new team, with a dislocated finger.

But like I've been saying all along.

And no one has even tried to counter.

That we don’t know if Orton looked better because he is better, or because the offense clearly changed after Haley was fired.

I liked Orton before he became a Chief.

And just going by the eye test, he looked a lot better to me than Cassel. I hope we get more games to evaluate with him next season.

Making excuses?

I’m suprised.

Anyway, his career stats line up pretty well with his 3 game rental in KC. And career stats over 6 years are pretty definative.

Well if you are gonna play the career line

Cassel has a QB rating of 82.8 as a starter.

I really don’t have a favorite in this discussion, and I really could care less who the QB is next year. with either guy the offense won’t be great next year.

Ummm

was the KC offense really any better with Orton?

Yeah it was an honesty question
So what you are really saying is that if you ignore the last game

Cassel was 27-4. Even better numbers.

No he was

27-10 in the regular season…

And

if you actuallly Watched those games, you woudl know Cassel was absolutely horrible and could not move the ball and it was basically all Jamaal Charles that year.

and if you watched the games the previous year he took the Chiefs to the playoffs

while protecting the ball

Yeah

cuz with so many good QBs in the league now, I would play Cassel who “takes care” of the ball for one season while Charles jsut dominates defense instead of a QB who can actually exploit the defense stacking 8 or 9 in the box

Yeah, because Orton really exploited defenses this year
Looked better than Cassel

with no Jamaal or Tomo

The offense was also significantly different...

Like I said earlier.

Did Orton play better because the offense was opened up after Haley left, or is Orton actually an upgrade over Cassel.

You can’t really prove either.

So

why the hell would you go with Cassel who has shown no positives except for the fact that he played after an appendectomy against teh rams.

you sure love your hyperbole
then

what aspect of his QB has been a positive?

3100 yards last year with only 7 picks
Those

are stats. We can also see that he was 26th in accuracy that year. What part of his QB play is a positive?

You said he is that Cassel has no positives

Im just giving things that disprove that

I guess the only way to prove it

is start Orton next season :)

Or Cassel
We already know what Cassel can do.

And it’s not good enough.

We don't know what Cassel will do without Haley
What

part of his QB play is such a positive that he would prove to be a successful QB if Haley goes out?

He did go to a Pro Bowl last year
That

is not an aspect of QB play. Did he show good consistency in throwing the ball? Did he show good accuracy? Did he show good decision making? Did he show good QB pocket awareness?

What part of his QB play is so appealing to you?

When did I ever say he was appealing to me?

You just keep using hyperbole and circumstantial evidence that proves nothing

Well

im just asking what is your defense of Cassel? What makes him a good QB? I just honestly want to know why you think he is a better QB than Orton.

He's not.

Going through progressions- Orton
Deep ball- Orton
Accuracy- Orton
Pocket presence- Orton

Not to mention a really good play action qb. With Jamaal back. drool

So you're saying Orton > Palko?
I never said he was

I asked is Orton a better QB than Cassel.

And everything you have said is hyperbole and circumstantial.

Nothing you have said definitively says that Orton is better than Cassel. We don’t know if Orton looked better because he is better, or if Cassel looked worse because Haley was holding an arm behind his back…

Because here is what I know. The offensive play calling was dramatically better after Haley was fired.

I have a feeling it will be more of the same.

Staring down his primary receiver and expecting him to make a great catch. That and panicking in the pocket and somehow falling into a defender. More consistent 3-and-outs.

We've already seen what Cassel can do with those weapons.
13 turnovers in 9 games while only putting up 10 TDs?

“Protecting the football” is a great trait of a backup QB.

Not arguing with that

My point is that Orton’s biggest strength is that he is the replacement QB. Not because he actually came in and did something with the team.

was the KC offense really any better with Orton?
+999999999999999999999999
And actually

I seem to remember scoring more TDs this year with Cassel

Heres what I saw...

I saw a more aggressive offense after Haley got fired. I don’t know if that was Orton or Haley.

But they didn’t really score any more points.

Orton

beat the packers, should have been Oakland if it wasnt for the two blocked field goals which he could do nothign about, and beat denver.

Cassel would have lost all three games outright.

Circumstantial evidence is Circumstantial
Or

the interception he threw in the endzone.

Apples to oranges.

Give Orton an offseason of work with the team and in the system with an actual running game behind him and it’s hard to not understand why people would be more optimistic about him then Cassel.

that may be...

Or give Cassel a chance without Haley and its hard not to understand why you could be more optimistic about Cassel.

I mean, I like Orton more. But I don’t think any evidence we have is definite one way or the other

Except

we should go with what evidence we do have.

And all evidence points to the fact that Orton will make us a more successful team.

what evidence?

your skills as a pro evaluator?

We are talking about a QB that has been gotten rid of by two teams
there been a few great players kc let go only to be good some where else
how many of those were QB's?
qb wise rich gannon comes to mind
Word is though that Haley is the reason why Cassel succeeded last year.

So that’s not much of an argument either.

Except I think it was Weis so whatever
I just think we've seen the ceiling for Cassel.

And the potential of Orton is higher then that. Not endorsing settling for another retread QB but if the only two options next year are Orton and Cassel it’s a no brainer for me.

I don't think one is that much better than the other...

Aside from Orton’s wicked play fake I haven’t seen anything from him that says he is much better than Cassel.

He can read defenses, go through progressions,

Convert third down passes. All I know is the offense was better with a guy that was on the team for three weeks with a busted up finger then they did with the guy who’s been with the team for three years.

except

he can actaully move the ball down the field.

Dont you remember all the 3 and outs with Cassel? it was a miracle if he actually converted on a 3rd down.

Orton threw 1 TD in 3 games.

Hardly moving the ball down the field

He threw 1 TD

but he set up more for our running game, but im talking about not going 3 and out.

oh that whopping 13 points per game...

watch out league

He moved the ball down field just fine.

I seem to remember a few TD drops and a complete failure by the o line to open up holes inside the 20 (or anywhere for that matter)

I remember Bowe dropping passes from Cassel too
Yeah

cuz his passes were usually behind or over his receivers.
But bowe did drop passes, and he has improved every year unlike Cassel who has shown the same annual anemic QB play

u mean cassel lazer passes to bowe

just like obama is lazer focused on jobs

ha

Orton moved the ball fine or don’t u remember throwing deep to cooper and pope and bowe and actually further than 10 yards without much time with our we’d no offseason to learn the playbook and no Jamal charles and made the oline look better come on Orton over Cassel anyway

Exactly

There’s more then just yards and points scored. We had issues in the red zone(gold zone) this year because of the running game, but Ortons success also extends to keeping the defense off the field and keeping the field position in our favor.

yeah

Cassel had 3 years to figure it out he’s done flynn has experience in college and little in the nfl he can play better than Cassel. flynn will have a better run game here in kc all the weapons we have aren’t that bad to greenbays and a improved oline I think Orton should be resigned or flynn picked up cuz Cassel is not the answer how many times you wanna see this guy till you figure out he just ain’t it?

Seriously

It’s like the play of palko just erased everyones memories of how shitty Cassel was int he first place.

Seriously

It’s like the play of Orton just erased everyones memories of how shitty Palko was int he first place.

Ok, so pull out the offseason bullshit arguement.

This isn’t dick vermiel’s playbook. You wanna know the biggest reason he may not have known the playbook? Cause he showed up late. He didn’t want to be here, so he didn’t try.

He didn't try?

This was the best chance that he had to audition for a contract to get paid next year. Why wouldn’t he try? You can’t learn the system and get chemistry with your players in a couple of weeks where more then half the time you couldn’t throw the ball because you had a busted up finger.

While it is true

they both arent franchise QBs, Orton is a much better QB than Cassel.

based on what?

Stats? Only if you throw out Ortons worst years, and Cassels best. Kinda handy that you get to do that, huh

not true they both are good but Ortons simply done more with less and hes far ahead of Matt in his mechanics etc

Matts good but hes actually older than Orton but far behind him in his overall development as a qb despite having advantages that Orton would probably break don in tears about and thats what everyone sees . Not simply that they have similar stats so that makes them the same .

orton a way better qb than cassel
Flynn?

Not sure anyone knows if he’s real or not. And a report that the Packers aren’t likely going to franchise him and will let him walk is pretty telling.

Weird play call or execution.
ed reed is showing his age
Big loss for the AFC Champ game
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
hmmmmmmmmm

They were my pick in the preseason... And if Shaub hadn't gotten hurt It could have come true
Agreed

Can’t imagine they lose this game with Shaub and they would’ve been a good matchup vs the Pats.

And they likely would have had a first round bye
I swear

people just forgot how crappy Cassel was as a QB.

I just love seeing our QB with 60 yards at the half with a 0/6 third down conversion rate.

Looks like Patriots and Packers. Should be a good game

An old fashioned Shoot out. Brady wins.

Cassel Is The Man

…in 2012! Sorry boys, he’s better than Orton and coming back. Might be time for you to find a new team to follow cause Cassel is our guy.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Arrowhead Pride to post a comment.