SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Arrowhead Pride

NFL Draft 2012: Luke Kuechly Seems Like A Logical Chiefs Pick

When examining players that the Kansas City Chiefs could be interested in during the NFL draft, we usually have a few qualities in mind: High character guy. High floor. Safe. Fundamentally strong. That's now always how GM Scott Pioli drafts (see the 2011 NFL draft) but those are the types of players that the Chiefs like to bring in, and have consistently brought in over three years.

When applying those qualities to the 2012 NFL draft, I keep coming back to Boston College LB Luke Kuechly. He just seems like a Pioli type of pick. Via CBS Sports:

"He might be the safest player in the draft, to be honest with you," one high-level scout said. "You look at his stats and you think there is no way that he can be in on that many tackles but when you watch the tape, he is. Just an incredibly instinctive player who is always around the action. I'm not so sure he's going to test well or fits in every scheme, but he's a hell of a player who can be the quarterback of your defense for the next 10 years because of his leadership and preparation."

The Chiefs are drafting 11th or 12th so Kuechly will probably be there (nothing's guaranteed, though). Mel Kiper and Todd McShay have both mocked Kuechly to KC.

I'd throw Kuechly into the pile of players the Chiefs could be considering in April.

0 recs  |  78 comments

Comments

I know it's always nice to go BPA over need, but I just feel like ILB isn't even close to our biggest need heading into the draft.
Still a long time before then, too.

Who knows what gets done before that day.

Unless we address RT, LG, NT, WR, CB, and, most importantly, QB in free agency before the draft, ILB will not be our biggest need.

And, honestly, even if we sign Manning and especially if we sign someone like Orton or Campbell, I’d still rather see that 1st round pick used to help acquire a QBOTF.

I don’t think that’s likely to happen, but nonetheless.

I definitely agree that RT, QB, and NT have to be addressed first

And there aren’t enough (any?) good RTs available in free agency, so RT will be the pick, even if we move down.

I didn't like this pick at first...

but I’ve been warming up to it. If we can upgrade the both lines in FA, I would be willing to spend a 1st at LB. I’m a little higher on Dont’a though.

Calling Bullshit

http://www.newerascouting.com/2012/01/19/luke-kuechly-2012-nfl-draft-scouting-report/

Everyone was saying the same thing about Bryan Bulaga couple years back. Consistent, solid, nothing flashy, lunch pail type of player. Barf. Give me an athletic freak who’s ceiling is thru the roof

I know quite a few smart, hard-working, high character people.

I wouldn’t draft any of them 12th overall to back up DJ for six years.

It's called a 3-4

He wouldn’t back up DJ

It's called being a WILB in our system so yeah he is a back up
Are you arguing that he wouldn't be an upgrade over Belcher?

Because that is who he would be replacing, if we were to draft him.

No he wouldn't

He is in no way shape or form a SILB in our system, he would be on the bench not on the field.

Re: High floor?

Um, what?

Meaning very low risk.
Passing up all the 1st round talent

for this 2nd round scrub sounds hella risky to me

Seriously LOL'd.

Gonna get in trouble at work.

Scrub???

Tell me why you think he is a scrub, give me an intelligent answer please?

Because he's a guy who can't get no love from me

Not 1st round talent. How many MLB’s have gone 1st round over the past couple years? He’s no better than Laurinaitis, which, remind me again what round he was drafted in?

How many Butkus Award winners go round 1?

2011 – Luke Kuechly, Boston College
2010 – Von Miller, Texas A&M
2009 – Rolando McClain, Alabama
2008 – Aaron Curry, Wake Forest
2007 – James Laurinaitis, Ohio State University
2006 – Patrick Willis, Mississippi
2005 – Paul Posluszny, Penn State
2004 – Derrick Johnson, Texas

1988 - Derrick Thomas, Alabama
Your talent evaluation is based on Skin Color

Which shows your ignorance… Bulaga, Laurinaitis…

Also, I guarantee you that if teams knew the kind of player Laurinaitis would translate to, they would’ve taken him in the first round, he is one of the top LBs in the entire NFL.

If Luke can play like Laurinaitis, I’ll take him all day.

BTW, your response wasn’t intelligent, didn’t show me you have watched any tape on the guy

Posluz & Laurinatis

are the comparisons, throw in Sean Lee whom IMO is even better than Posluz. All 3 MLB’s – all 3 second round picks. Why does Kuechly deviate from this group?

Why do I need to make an “intelligent” defense after I already posted a link highlighting his flaws? You want me to recycle someone else’s opinions as my own informed, independent analysis?

The race card? Classy.

Compare him to someone black then

simple solution.

Race is irrelevant

Rey Maualuga is an example. Yet another MLB prospect more gifted than Kuechly, who came from a better program, and was drafted 2nd round. Kuechly isn’t a Top 12 talent, come off it

No, Rey wasn't more talented

Rey dropped to the second cause he had a terrible 40 time and lots of other question marks that arose during Pro Days and the evaluation period.

Also, in the NFL thus far James >> Rey

Rey's big issue was also

he couldn’t stay on the field for more then 2 plays in college.

Also, Side note

He compares in no way shape or form to Rey, skill sets are very different… not helping out your case of being able to evaluate talent

You're right

we’re comparing apples to orange’s here. A 4-3 Mike vs. a projected 4-3 Mike. My bad

Just cause someone plays the same position

doesn’t mean they are comparable

You're right

We have to caution ourselves when analyzing Cassel that just because he’s a QB doesn’t mean he should be compared to others. Oh wait.

This will be settled come draft day

Clearly Kuechly is such a can’t miss prospect we’ll be hearing his name Called Day 1. Bookmarked.

I think it will be

or should be.

You just solidified your race card even moreso

By bringing Sean Lee and Puz into the conversation.

Also, I stand by my comment that if people knew James was going to translate so well into the NFL they would’ve taken him in round 1, which is why their is an increased chance that Luke will go in round 1… based on your comparisons.

I’m not even saying that Luke is my top choice at 11/12, cause he is not, but we could do a lot worse, and he would provide us with a solid player, and a sure tackler for years.

Because I used

2 of the more prominent MLB prospect’s as means of comparison’s? For the sake of argument – how many black MLB’s have been drafted in the Top 2 rounds in years past?

Prominent because they are good
Get back to me on that answer
He seems like a legit player

but OT would be a better fill IMO

Its logical if we ran a 4-3

Since we don’t it would make no sense.

Granted I wouldn’t mind Kuechly since I think he’s got the upside and intangibles to fit eventually, but he’s rather low end on people I’d want.

I’d rather draft Ryan Tannehil or even Dont’a Hightower.

Actually, he makes more sense in a 3-4
No he doesn't

At all, how does he make sense in a 3-4?

Chiefs sign Stanford Routt

3 yr 20 million

If you aint got a three-lettered acronym for a name

dont want you

or two letters and one digit
If Pioli actually pulled the trigger on this

I think I would never ever question anything he did ever again. He would instantly be the best thing that’s happened to the Chiefs in 40 years.

This is just 'news' for news' sake.

There’s no way in hell we pick this guy. But, it would be boring if all the draft outlets kept saying we’re picking a RT. So, they look at what we need and slot in some guys who fit the bill. That’s fine. But, like a few people have said, we have other GLARING holes that need to be addressed.

If by logical you mean completely illogical because he's not a SILB by any stretch then I completely agree.
Joel's still feelin the Mclain pain.
If we're gonna ignore big needs

I want DeCastro if he is there

Because guard is a big need?
He did say if we're gonna ignore big needs

I think ignore was the operative word

i figured RT is a bigger need than a guard
Doesn't fit
I’m not so sure he’s going to test well or fits in every scheme

That would be our scheme they are talking about, not a SILB, last I checked DJ56 was doing “all right” at WILB.

He can play SILB

nothing about his game says he can’t, I’d actually argue he is better suited for SILB than WILB

Nothing about his game says he can't?

Watch the kid play! He doesn’t take and shed blocks, hardly crashes the line. Usually flows down the line so he stays clean and can make a play.

Fixed
Watch the kid play! He doesn’t take and shed blocks, hardly crashes the line. Usually flows down the line so he stays clean and can make a play 10 yards downfield.
He makes plays around the LOS and can make them behind when he meets the RB in the hole

A ton of his tackles are way beyond the LOS however

He does an awful lot of running around blockers.

That doesn’t bode well for a SILB.

So true

then again a lot of people don’t care for technique or anything.. see big stats and ‘’omg I WANTZ’

OMG he had 17 tackles and 10 assists in one game!!

Trade up to take him!

He has got to be a man beast, and a perfect fit for us at SILB if he can do that!
Good player

But its just not worth it. Trade up for RG3 or get Oline

My man

I hope Mel and McShay are correct.

I had your back with Berry.

But not this time, coach.

I would rather trade down several times and draft Hightower or Burfict.

Then come back with OT, TE, G in rds 2-3.

to be happy with this signing

i’d have to see Pioli sign Nicks and Bell, and then still draft another lineman or two.

There would be nothing logical about the drafting of Kuechly

An SILB that comes off whenever the team plays nickel or dime defenses? The SILB is the least important position in a 3-4, especially in a pass-happy league.

agree

I would hate having two Butkus Award winners in the middle of my 3-4 Defense. I mean, why would you spend a top pick to help lock up the front 7 w/ a tackling machine who has a high football IQ and great character.

Because he doesn't fit our scheme
Really?

You’re argument is based on an award where 2 of the 3 most recent winners have been complete busts?

Well like.. yeah!

He got a trophy.. that has to mean he will be a beast at the next level!

A good rule of thumb

If you are on the same page as Todd McShay then you’re probably reading the wrong book.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Arrowhead Pride to post a comment.